The Football Kenya Federation (FKF) is under fresh scrutiny after FIFA formally wrote to the federation’s National Executive Committee (NEC), demanding detailed documentation and explanations regarding recent leadership changes within the organization.

The global football governing body has raised concerns over the process that led to the suspension of key officials and the appointment of McDonald Mariga as acting FKF President, requesting comprehensive evidence to verify whether proper procedures were followed.

What FIFA Is Demanding

In its communication, FIFA has asked FKF to provide a wide range of documents and records related to the NEC meeting held on April 24. These include:

• Proof of how the NEC meeting was convened, including notices, requests, and circulation details
• The official agenda showing how the resolution was included and discussed
• Evidence of quorum and detailed voting results, including attendance and individual votes
• Any formal proposals that introduced the motion to the agenda
• All documents, reports, and materials used to justify the decision
• Confirmation that all affected officials were given a fair hearing before the resolution was passed
• A detailed written explanation supporting the NEC’s decision
• Any additional documents deemed relevant to the matter

Scrutiny Over Governance Process

FIFA, working alongside the Confederation of African Football (CAF), is currently assessing whether FKF followed its own statutes and governance procedures in making the controversial decisions.

The request signals growing concern at the highest levels of world football about transparency, due process, and internal governance within the federation.

Deadline Set for FKF

The FKF NEC has been given until May 1, 2026, to submit all the requested documents and clarifications to FIFA for review.

Failure to comply or provide satisfactory evidence could lead to further action from football’s global governing bodies, depending on the findings of the assessment.

What Happens Next?

As FKF prepares its response, attention will now shift to whether the federation can fully demonstrate that the leadership changes were conducted in line with its statutes and proper governance procedures.

The outcome of this review could have significant implications for the future of football administration in Kenya, especially at a time when stability and trust in leadership are under close watch.